| 20 |
|
Open commitments age at year end, including POs that will likely never be invoiced. |
Outstanding commitments on the balance sheet are inflated because POs that will never be invoiced are still open. Forecasting is distorted. Year-end becomes a scramble to either close the POs or justify carrying them forward. |
Sort aged open commitments (inactive, waiting for receipt, or waiting for invoice) and route the right action to the right owner well before close, with weekly aging reports to procurement leadership. |
| 21 |
|
No vendor performance tracking. Underperformers get contracts renewed without data. |
Vendors with chronic late delivery, price creep, or invoice errors keep getting new business because nobody is measuring them. Good vendors don't get credit. Renewal decisions get made on relationship and inertia. |
Calculate vendor performance metrics from ERP transactions (on-time delivery, price variance, invoice error rate, dispute frequency, change volume) and deliver them at renewal time and on demand from any channel. |
| 22 |
|
Backlogs usually do not trigger alerts. They show up as slower cycle times. By the time vendors complain, the queue is full. |
When invoice, PO, or exception volume rises, cycle times get longer, but nobody sees it coming until vendors start complaining or month-end misses. AP and procurement end up reacting after the backlog has already formed. |
Track the number of open invoices, POs, and exceptions in real time and recommend the specific action (reassignment, additional reviewer, vendor outreach) that would prevent the backlog before vendors feel it. |
| 23 |
|
Unusual documents. Some POs go through hundreds of changes. Some invoices touch dozens of orders. |
A small number of documents consume a disproportionate share of buyer and AP time, but because the cost is spread across many touches, it never shows up as a line item anyone investigates. These outliers are also where audit findings tend to concentrate. |
Flag documents with unusual activity levels in real time and link the underlying transactions, so leadership can step in before the pattern becomes the norm. |
| 24 |
|
Reporting access is inconsistent. Some users lack permissions, some do not know where to go, and escalation paths are unclear. |
Reports depend on the one person who knows how to run them. When that person is out, reports stop. Decisions get made without data because the data is too hard to get. |
Serve as the front door for reporting. Authorized users request reports in plain language from email or chat, permissions are enforced, queries run against the ERP, and recurring reports are scheduled and saved to the user's dashboard. |